Administrative friction is common and wide ranging, and its impact hard to measure.
Someone downloads a spreadsheet because the information they need isn’t available in the report. A colleague checks another system before replying to a member. Event registrations have to be matched against CRM records. Finance sends over a list of payments that someone in membership needs to reconcile. A new starter asks where the latest version of a document lives.
Each task might take a few minutes.
But that’s precisely why administrative friction can be so difficult to see. It doesn’t usually appear as one significant problem. It accumulates across hundreds of small interactions, workarounds and manual processes that gradually become accepted as part of ‘getting the job done’.
And the real cost isn’t simply the time it consumes. Administrative friction reduces the amount of organisational capacity available to create value for members.
Most organisations don't design administrative friction. They inherit it.
Very few membership organisations deliberately create complicated processes. More often, complexity builds gradually.
A new platform is introduced to solve one particular problem. A spreadsheet fills a gap between two systems. A manual check is added because an integration isn’t completely reliable. A reporting process develops around the person who knows where all the information lives.
Individually, each decision can be perfectly reasonable. Over time, though, the organisation develops an invisible operational layer that sits between its people and the work they’re trying to do.
The latest MemberWise Digital Excellence research reflects this wider challenge. While membership organisations have made progress with digital technology, data silos, manual processes and underused tools remain common. Its 2026 findings also identify the inability to automate administrative tasks as the sector’s second-biggest digital challenge, behind only the ability to measure member engagement.
This is important because administrative friction isn’t confined to the back office. Eventually, members experience it too.
The cost is bigger than the minutes spent on the task
When organisations look at administrative efficiency, the most obvious calculation is time.
If a task takes 15 minutes and happens four times a week, that’s an hour of staff time. Useful to know, but incomplete.
Imagine a membership manager wants to understand why attendance at a particular event series has fallen.
The event data sits in one system. Membership information sits somewhere else. Email engagement is held in the communications platform. Previous attendance has to be exported. Someone maintains another spreadsheet containing information that isn’t reliably captured anywhere else.
The eventual report might only take an hour to assemble. But the cost isn’t just that hour.
There’s the interruption to whatever the membership manager was doing beforehand. The time spent checking whether different records match. The uncertainty over which data is current. The possibility that the exercise gets postponed because gathering the information feels disproportionately difficult.
And then there’s the possibility that some useful work is simply not done because getting to the answer is too difficult.
That’s where administrative friction becomes much harder to quantify.
Friction creates an organisational attention tax
Every manual workaround asks something of the person doing it.
Remember this process. Check that spreadsheet. Ask this colleague. Export from here. Update there. Don’t forget that this system only synchronises overnight.
None of those instructions is particularly demanding on its own. Together, they create what we might think of as an organisational attention tax.
People aren’t just spending time on administration. They’re spending mental capacity remembering how the organisation’s processes fit together.
That has consequences.
Staff become dependent on individual knowledge. New starters take longer to become confident. Holidays and absences expose processes that only one person fully understands. Simple questions travel between departments because no one person can see the complete picture.
Over time, workarounds stop feeling like workarounds and simply become “how we do things here”.
That can make the problem surprisingly resilient.
Disconnected technology can make good people less effective
This is why administrative friction isn’t fundamentally a productivity problem.
You can have an excellent membership team working extremely hard and still have an inefficient membership operation.
If information is fragmented across a CRM, website, event platform, email system, payment provider and a collection of spreadsheets, people inevitably become the integration layer.
This isn’t just a theoretical problem.
The Australian Anthropological Society experienced it first-hand. Membership, conference registrations, abstract management and payments had gradually become spread across separate systems, creating additional administration and making the organisation increasingly dependent on individuals knowing how everything fitted together.
After moving those activities into one connected membership platform, the impact went beyond making individual tasks quicker. Day-to-day administration became easier and the organisation became less dependent on knowledge held by a single administrator.
As Acting President Tim Pilbrow explained:
“If we lost our administrator tomorrow and there was no handover, it would not be difficult to onboard a new person.”
For a membership organisation, that’s more than a time saving. It’s operational resilience.
Read how the Australian Anthropological Society reduced administrative complexity →
Connected membership management changes the equation
This is where a more connected approach can have a much greater effect than simply automating individual tasks.
If event attendance, communications, payments, member records and other important interactions are connected, information can move with the member rather than being repeatedly moved by staff.
An event registration becomes part of the member record. A payment updates the information available to the membership team. Participation contributes to the organisation’s understanding of engagement. Communications can reflect the activities and interests already visible elsewhere.
The benefit isn’t simply fewer clicks. It’s the removal of entire administrative steps.
There’s an important difference between making a manual process 20% faster and making the process unnecessary.
That’s where connected technology can become transformative for operational efficiency. Instead of asking people to work faster across fragmented systems, it reduces the amount of work required to connect the organisation in the first place.
And once information is connected, the benefits start to extend beyond administration.
Reporting becomes easier because information doesn’t need to be assembled every time. Engagement becomes easier to understand because activity isn’t isolated in different platforms. Personalisation becomes more practical because communications can draw on a broader picture of the member relationship.
One improvement starts enabling another.
Members experience organisational friction too
Members don’t see most of the processes happening behind the scenes. But they often see the consequences.
They’re asked for information the organisation already holds. They receive communications that don’t reflect something they’ve just done. They have to contact the team to complete a process that could have been self-service. They register for an event but their participation isn’t visible when they later speak to someone in membership. They wait for an answer because the person helping them has to check with another department.
From the member’s perspective, the distinction between CRM, events, finance and communications is largely irrelevant. They’re interacting with one organisation. The experience should feel like it.
This is why reducing administrative friction can improve more than staff productivity. Connected processes make it easier to create connected member experiences.
There is also a data cost
Manual processes don’t only consume time. They create opportunities for information to become incomplete, duplicated or inconsistent.
Every time data is copied from one place to another, there is another opportunity for something to go wrong.
More importantly, fragmented information limits what an organisation can learn.
A membership team might know who renewed. The events team knows who attended. Communications knows who clicked. Finance knows who paid. Individually, each team has useful information.
But the organisation doesn’t necessarily have insight.
That insight is becoming increasingly important. MemberWise’s latest research identifies the inability to measure member engagement as the sector’s biggest digital challenge, while ASAE reports that retention and engagement remain the leading membership challenge for associations.
It’s difficult to understand a relationship when the evidence of that relationship is scattered across the organisation.
Administrative friction and the engagement challenge are therefore more closely connected than they first appear.
Not every manual process needs to disappear
There is a temptation in conversations about efficiency to assume that automation is always the answer.
It’s not.
Some processes benefit from human judgement. Some interactions should remain personal. Some exceptions are too infrequent to justify automating them. And sometimes a spreadsheet genuinely is the simplest tool for the job.
The goal isn’t to eliminate every manual action.
It’s to identify where human involvement adds value and where people are simply compensating for the way systems and processes have been designed. A membership professional speaking to a member who appears to be disengaging is valuable human involvement.
That same membership professional spending an hour combining four spreadsheets to discover that the member is disengaging probably isn’t.
Technology should create more space for the first by reducing the second.
Start looking for friction, not just broken processes
The hardest administrative problems to identify are often the ones that technically work.
Renewals get processed. Reports eventually get produced. Events happen. Members receive responses. Nothing is obviously broken.
But “it works” is a fairly low bar for an operational process.
A more useful set of questions might be:
- Where are people entering the same information more than once?
- Where does somebody regularly export data into a spreadsheet?
- Which reports require information from several places?
- Where does a member have to contact staff because systems can’t complete the process?
- Which tasks depend on one person knowing how everything fits together?
- Where are teams manually passing information between systems?
- What would our team spend more time doing if they didn’t have to do this?
That last question changes the calculation.
The value of removing administrative friction isn’t measured only in minutes saved. It’s measured in what those minutes make possible.
More conversations with members. Better services. Earlier intervention when engagement falls. Stronger events. Better decisions. More time to experiment, improve and create.
Administrative friction is easy to tolerate because each individual piece looks small. Its cumulative effect is anything but.
Considering new membership technology?
Use our Membership Management Evaluation Framework to compare potential systems on more than features and initial price. It will help you assess implementation, integrations, usability, long-term ownership and the complete member experience.
If you would like to see how CRM, community, events, communications and engagement insight work together in VeryConnect, book a free 30-minute demo. We’ll explore your current setup, show you the relevant parts of the platform and tell you honestly whether VeryConnect is the right fit for your organisation.